MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417121945 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.03.25341560

A population-based cohort study to establish clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients experiencing methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia as a function of the cefazolin high inoculum effect

2025· article· W4417121945 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alexander Kipp, Kristine Du, Barbara Wadell, Stephen Robinson, Julianna Svishchuk, John Conly, Annegret Ulke‐Lemée, Maryam Mapar, Ian A. Lewis, Daniel B. Gregson, Michael D. Parkins

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie UniversityCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Precision LaboratoriesGenome Canada
KeywordsBacteremiaCefazolinIncidence (geometry)CohortCohort studyPopulationDemographicsPopulation study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Several phenotypes (e.g. methicillin-resistance) influence patient outcomes. The high inoculum effect (HIE) is characterized by reduced susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics, most notably cefazolin, at high inoculums in-vitro . Methods A population-based cohort was used to assess all MSSA bacteremia in Calgary, Alberta, from 2012-14 and 2019 (n=1.5 million). Isolates underwent genomic sequencing and cefazolin susceptibility testing at 10 5 and 10 7 CFU/ml where the HIE was defined as a 4X-increase in minimum-inhibitory concentration (MIC) and pronounced (PIE) defined as MIC≥16 ug/ml at 10 7 CFU/ml. Results The incidence of MSSA bacteremia with HIE decreased from 38.9 to 24.2% between the two time periods. Patients infected with HIE phenotype could not be differentiated based on demographics, source of bacteremia, or clinical biomarkers at presentation. Sequencing confirmed associations of HIE with blaZ A, agr3, and clonal complex 30. HIE was not associated with outcomes including clearance-time and all-cause mortality when assessed in aggregate or as a function of treatment. Relapses, however, were only documented with cefazolin. PIE was observed in 3.7% of isolates and was associated with significant increased all-cause 180-day mortality, irrespective of treatment, but not at one year. Discussion The HIE, but not PIE, is common in an unselected general population cohort. Neither demographics nor clinical biomarkers can be used to predict HIE. If there is a deleterious impact of this phenotype on patient outcomes, it is modest and may be masked by empiric therapy provided prior to MSSA bacteremia confirmation. Importance Statement A prospective cohort study by Miller et al. (2018) observed a significant increase in 30-day mortality in individuals experiencing methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, with isolates exhibiting the high-inoculum effect (HIE) phenotype, when treated with the cefazolin. Our study sought to understand the epidemiology and impact of the HIE, using a population-based study design thereby mitigating the selection bias associated with other conventional cohort studies (focused on specific hospitals, at-risk groups, or clinics). We address the effects of HIE on clinical outcomes, predictive factors, and associated genomic contributors for the HIE phenotype within an unbiased population. These data are important for clinicians by highlighting if it is possible to predict HIE phenotype based on clinical and genomic factors, and to establish if cefazolin use associates with worse outcomes when MSSA causing bacteremia exhibits the HIE phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207