MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417121956 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c03400

Photodissociation Dynamics of H <sub>2</sub> S via the 3 <sup>1</sup> <i>A</i> ′ State: Dominance of Dual Intersection-Induced Barriers

2025· article· en· W4417121956 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Li, Junyan Wang, Junjie Chen, Shanyu Han, Xixi Hu, Daiqian Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNanjing UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotodissociationDiabaticDissociation (chemistry)Potential energySulfurQuantumHydrogenWave packetUltravioletQuantum dynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), a major sulfur carrier in the interstellar medium, undergoes ultraviolet photodissociation that shapes interstellar sulfur chemistry and sulfur isotope fractionation. Here we construct a four-state diabatic potential energy matrix for the lowest four 1 A ′ states of H 2 S using high-level ab initio data and a neural-network-based diabatization scheme. Quantum wave packet dynamics on the 3 1 A ′ state reproduce the main experimental features of the H + SH(X 2 Π/A 2 Σ + ) internal energy distributions at 143.15 nm, with minor discrepancies likely due to the unaccounted contributions of 1 A ″ states. Trajectory surface-hopping simulations show that H 2 S undergoes transient trapping in a basin formed by dual intersection-induced barriers on the 2 1 A ′ surface. This dual-barrier topology restricts dissociation to a narrow escape pathway along the bond-angle coordinate, promoting SH(A 2 Σ + ) formation. The results reveal a new mechanism in which dual intersection-induced barriers govern product branching in high-lying electronic states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207