Cultural Transmission of Guzheng in Malaysian Chinese Communities: A Systematic-Informed Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to systematically sort out the existing research results on the development of the guzheng in the Chinese society of Malaysia and respond to the current problem of insufficient theoretical integration in the construction of ethnic identity and the inheritance of music culture in this field. As a traditional musical instrument with both historical and cultural symbolism, the guzheng is not only a carrier of artistic practice in the multi-ethnic society of Malaysia but also increasingly a medium for the expression of ethnic identity and cultural negotiation. Therefore, clarifying the dissemination path, educational mechanism, and social function of the guzheng in Malaysia is of great significance for understanding how overseas Chinese music can be continued and recreated in the local context. This study employed a systematic-informed integration methodology (Toronto XXABSTRACT Remington, 2020), which combines the transparency of systematic with the thematic induction of an integration. Eight representative studies were selected from the literature between 2000 and 2024 for analysis. The research content mainly revolves around four aspects: historical development, teaching practice, cultural identity, and intergenerational inheritance and interaction. The results show that the guzheng in Malaysia has gradually transformed from the early family inheritance to institutionalized teaching in schools and communities and has strengthened identity recognition and intergenerational cultural continuity in the Chinese community. However, most of the current related research focuses on the Chinese community and is mostly qualitative analysis, lacking in-depth discussion on the participation of other ethnic groups, the process of learner identity change, and localized teaching content. This study not only outlines the overall knowledge landscape of guzheng research in Malaysia but also clearly points out that in the future, teaching experiments, questionnaires, and ethnic comparative studies can be used to promote the sustainable development of guzheng in any Southeast Asian society and expand the theoretical discussion space of ethnomusicology on culturality, cross-cultural communication, and formal educational practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".