MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417122953 · doi:10.26522/jess.v12i.5345

In my father's shoes

2025· article· W4417122953 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rohini Balram

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Sport Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismNarrativeGirlDescendantAthletesScotsWhite (mutation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While there is substantial literature on the sporting experiences of girls and women from the Global North and increasing contributions from the Global South, there remains a scarcity of narratives focused on minority and marginalised young non-Indigenous women and their athletic pursuits in involuntary postcolonial spaces, such as Indo-Fijians in Fiji. I am a fourth-generation descendant of Indian indentured labourers, who were brought to Fiji by British colonizers with false promises of a brighter future, only to become bound in servitude on the sugarcane plantations. Sports and physical activities have been an important part of my life since I was a child. I loved the thrill I got from playing soccer with my male cousins and the excitement I felt whilst sprinting barefoot under the blazing Fijian sun. The sweet ache in my small muscles and the sweat streaming from my nine-year-old frame made me feel like the fastest girl on earth. I must have been a brave child to embrace such a narrative in a postcolonial home where rugby is religion, and associated with Indigenous Fijian men, who are predominantly Christian. Soccer on the other hand is often seen as a migrant (Indian) sport associated with people perceived as 'softer.' The colonizers had meticulously separated the Indian indentured labourers from the Indigenous Fijians, and after they left, the two races struggled to coexist in harmony. During my childhood, I couldn't understand that my place in this "Promised Land," shaped by colonial history and defined by my gender and race, was subtly constraining my affordances and potential in sports. I reject all Fijian stereotypes that depict Indo-Fijian women as fragile and unathletic. How could such notions hold when my foremothers laboured from dawn till dusk in the Fijian sugarcane fields -putting their bodies on the line and their strength and endurance tested daily? This anti-colonial autoethnography channels my voice and lived experiences through an intersectional lens to unveil the multifaceted layers of marginalisation that Indo-Fijian girls face in both formal and informal Fijian sports arenas. Its aim is to craft counter-narratives and elevate the voices of those whose experiences have been overshadowed or ignored by colonial and outsider viewpoints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Sport StudiesSame topicSports, Gender, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207