Magnesium Supplementation and Tachyarrhythmias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Magnesium supplementation is regularly given to acutely ill patients with serum levels below the standard reference range, primarily for the prevention of tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation. The evidence for this practice and the specific treatment thresholds used is limited. Conventional observational studies of this question are at risk of confounding by indication and other biases. Objective: To determine whether giving magnesium supplementation to patients with hypomagnesemia, as defined by a given institution's usual treatment cutoff, reduces adverse clinical outcome using a quasi-experimental study design that plausibly allows for causal inference. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing serum magnesium testing was conducted in 93 ICUs across the US and Europe between 2003 and 2022. A fuzzy regression discontinuity design was used, in which individuals just either side of the eligibility cutoff for magnesium supplementation were compared with regard to the study outcomes. This comparison was performed across a range of treatment cutoffs in current use, ranging from 1.6 mg/dL to 2.0 mg/dL. Data were analyzed from August to October 2025. Exposures: Magnesium supplementation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was ventricular or supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in the 24 hours after magnesium testing. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of hypotension or death. Results: A total of 478 901 twenty-four-hour treatment windows from 171 727 ICU admissions were included in the study. A total of 72 767 admitted patients (42.4%) were female, 98 960 (57.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 63 (16) years. There was no evidence of an effect of magnesium supplementation on the occurrence of tachyarrhythmia, with a risk difference of 0.1% (95% CI, -4.2 to 6.9). This was true across all the cutoff levels evaluated. There was similarly no association with the occurrence of hypotension (risk difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -0.9 to 17.7) or death (risk difference, 1.4%; 95% CI, -0.6 to 5.3). Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, routine supplementation of magnesium with currently used doses and treatment thresholds was not associated with beneficial effects for individuals with serum magnesium values close to those cutoffs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".