Graph Generalization for Software Engineering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph generalization is a powerful concept with a wide range of potential applications, while established algorithms exist for generalizing simple graphs, practical approaches for more complex graphs remain elusive. We introduce a novel formal model and algorithm (GGA) that generalizes labeled directed graphs without assuming label identity. We evaluate GGA by focusing on its information preservation relative to its input graphs, its scalability in execution, and its utility for three applications: abstract syntax trees, class graphs, and call graphs. Our findings reveal the superiority of GGA over alternative tools. GGA outperforms ASGard by an average of 5–18% on metrics related to information preservation; GGA matches 100% with diffsitter, indicating the correctness of the output. For class graphs, GGA achieves 77.1% in precision at 5, while for call graphs, it exhibits 60% in precision at 5 for a specific application problem. We also test performance for the first two applications: GGA’s execution time scales linearly with respect to the product of vertex count and edge count. Our research demonstrates the ability of GGA to preserve information in diverse applications while performing efficiently, signaling its potential to advance the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it