Immunogenicity of Adalimumab in Bacterial Molecular Mimicry: In Silico Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Adalimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting tumor necrosis factor α, treats autoimmune diseases but induces antidrug antibodies in 30% to 60% of patients, reducing its efficacy. Objective: This study aims to investigate molecular mimicry as a mechanism behind this immunogenicity, where bacterial immunoglobulin domains structurally resemble adalimumab's light chain, triggering immune responses. Methods: Using PSI-BLASTp (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and PRALINE (Center for Integrative Bioinformatics), there are 40 bacterial antigens homologous to adalimumab, with 8 clinically relevant strains. Results: Structural analysis revealed 94% amino acid identity between the immunoglobulin domain of Escherichia coli strain B1 and adalimumab's light chain, and 89.67% similarity with Corynebacterium pyruviciproducens. Root mean square deviation values confirmed strong structural homology. Additionally, 5 cross-reactive B-cell epitopes were predicted, suggesting overlapping surfaces that may promote immune cross-reactivity and antidrug antibody development. Conclusions: This study represents a first step toward identifying a potential microbial factor driving antiadalimumab antibody formation. The predicted cross-reactive regions provide specific candidates for further in vitro validation to confirm molecular mimicry and refine epitope mapping. Understanding these mechanisms may ultimately inform the design of less immunogenic biologics and guide clinical strategies to predict and prevent antidrug antibody formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".