Pharmacokinetic profile of dexamethasone in urine and plasma after single and multiple oral administration: Relevance to doping controls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dexamethasone (DEX) is prohibited in sports competitions when administered by all injectable, oral or rectal routes, and is permitted at all times when administered by all other routes. The present work aimed to assess the urinary excretion profile of DEX after single and multiple oral administrations to verify the suitability of the new minimum reporting level (MRL) of 60 ng/mL established by the World Anti-Doping Agency to distinguish allowed and prohibited administrations. Moreover, the minimum washout period of three days established for out-of-competition treatments with oral glucocorticoids will be evaluated. DEX was administered to healthy volunteers using two different oral treatments: single administration (4 mg, n = 8 male volunteers) and multiple administrations (2 mg/12 h for 5 days, n = 8 male volunteers). Urine and plasma samples collected before and after administration were analysed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. DEX and 6β‑hydroxy-DEX, were the predominant compounds detected in urine, with peak urinary excretion observed within the first 4 h post-dose. DEX concentrations exceeded the new MRL mainly within 12 h after a single dose, with one volunteer showing levels above this threshold up to 24-36 h. In the multiple-dose study, most of the DEX concentrations remained above 60 ng/mL after the second dose and throughout the dosing period and declined quickly after the final dose. Plasma DEX kinetics was defined by an open bicompartmental model with a first order oral absorption. DEX was detectable up to 48 h post-administration. In the multiple dose study, the steady-state concentrations were reached soon after the first dose, and DEX showed no evidence of accumulation. CORT levels decreased rapidly after both single and multiple administrations due to suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Recovery times varied among volunteers. The MRL of 60 ng/mL proved appropriate for distinguishing permitted from prohibited use with a 3-day washout, though further studies on non-systemic routes are recommended to refine sensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".