Violent Patient Management: Advanced Safety, Security, and Clinical Support Strategies in Healthcare Settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Workplace violence in healthcare settings is a prevalent and serious occupational hazard, disproportionately affecting frontline staff and disrupting clinical operations. Violent or aggressive patient behavior can stem from a complex interplay of medical, psychiatric, substance-related, and environmental factors, creating significant safety challenges for healthcare teams. Aim: This review aims to outline advanced safety, security, and clinical support strategies for the management of violent patients, focusing on a systematic, interprofessional approach that prioritizes de-escalation, accurate diagnosis, and evidence-based intervention. Methods: A comprehensive synthesis of current literature, guidelines (e.g., from ACEP), and best practices is presented. The review covers the epidemiology, etiology, and pathophysiology of violence, followed by a structured approach to evaluation, differential diagnosis, and a tiered management strategy ranging from non-pharmacological techniques to pharmacological sedation and physical restraint. Results: Effective management begins with prevention through environmental design, staff training, and early recognition of agitation. The cornerstone of intervention is verbal de-escalation. When this fails and imminent danger exists, pharmacological agents (e.g., IM haloperidol/lorazepam, atypical antipsychotics, or ketamine) or physical restraints may be necessary, applied under strict protocols. A thorough medical and psychiatric evaluation is critical to identify and treat underlying causes. Complications of management include oversedation, respiratory depression, and physical injury. Conclusion: Managing violent patients requires a balanced, patient-centered approach that integrates de-escalation, rapid stabilization, and definitive treatment of the underlying condition. Success depends on a coordinated interprofessional team, clear institutional policies, and a culture of safety that protects both patients and staff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".