MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417146382 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1672518

Central nervous system symptoms in mpox patients without HIV co-infection: a meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4417146382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Junwen Luan, Weimiao Lv, Xiaoyan Wang, Yuxuan Du, Xuejia Wang, Leiliang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCentral nervous systemHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)DiseaseImmune systemComponent (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Co-infection with HIV in patients infected with the mpox virus (MPXV) may pose a potential risk of influencing neurological manifestations. We aimed to synthesize the central nervous system (CNS) symptoms reported by mpox patients without HIV co-infection. Methods We conducted a search for studies on mpox published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Weipu Data till 2023/11/19. The type of studies included were cohort studies, case series, case–control trials, and randomized controlled trials. Reviews, editorials, pre-prints, and conference proceedings were excluded. We only included studies that reported neurological manifestations in mpox patients without HIV. STATA (version 16.0) was used to create forest plots that pooled the mean scores of CNS symptoms in mpox patients. Outcomes were presented with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Results We identified 2,311 unique studies, of which 14 (with a total of 989 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) tool. The majority of the included articles were rated as medium quality. The major CNS clinical features were myalgia, headache, and fatigue/asthenia, with pooled mean scores of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.13–0.31), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.17–0.33) and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.21–0.37) in mpox patients without HIV. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the meta-analysis results were stable. Additionally, Egger’s test ( p < 0·05) suggested that a low risk of publication bias in the included literature. Conclusion The MPXV may cause clinical nervous system injuries, including headache, myalgia, and fatigue/asthenia, as observed in approximately 25% (±3%) of the studied population. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024464199 , CRD42024464199.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.054
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207