MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417152280 · doi:10.64898/2025.11.28.25341226

Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization implicates TIMP2 as a putative causal protein for bone mineral density and fracture risk

2025· article· W4417152280 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen‐Yang Su, Masashi Hasebe

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityInstitute of Genetics
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJapan Student Services OrganizationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsMendelian randomizationOsteoporosisBone mineralSclerostinMendelian inheritanceBone densityQuantitative trait locusGenetic association

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Osteoporosis is a prevalent cause of fractures in older adults and remains a source of morbidity that requires efforts to develop therapeutics. Circulating proteins play a critical role in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and offer opportunities to identify new causal determinants of bone health. We therefore performed a large-scale proteome-wide Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to estimate the effects of genetically determined circulating proteins levels on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. Genetic instruments were derived from cis -protein quantitative trait loci ( cis -pQTLs) for 2,110 plasma proteins across four European ancestry cohorts and applied to genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of heel estimated BMD, femoral neck BMD, lumbar spine BMD, any fracture, and forearm fracture in up to 426,824 individuals of European ancestry. Across proteins and outcomes, 192 protein-skeletal outcome associations showed MR evidence of association, without evidence for heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, and 128 of these further showed strong colocalization with osteoporosis-related loci. We then prioritized proteins that replicated across cohorts, exhibited concordant effect directions, and were likely to be active in circulation, yielding 18 high-confidence causal proteins for BMD and fracture risk. These included established skeletal regulators such as sclerostin (SOST) and R-spondin-3 (RSPO3), which showed opposing effects consistent with their known biology, along with less well-characterized proteins. Higher genetically predicted tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP2) levels was associated with lower BMD and increased forearm fracture risk. Gene-level and variant-level phenome-wide association analyses converged on skeletal traits, and rare predicted damaging or loss-of-function variants in TIMP2 were associated with higher BMD at the heel, spine and hip. Our findings implicate several circulating proteins as putatively causal factors for osteoporosis and, among them, provide multiple layers of evidence supporting TIMP2 as a genetically supported candidate for further functional and translational evaluation. Lay summary Osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone density, and despite available medications, it remains a key risk factor for fractures, requiring continued effort for development of new therapeutics. We used genetic data to estimate the effect of genetically predicted levels of 2,110 blood proteins on strength and fracture risk. We found 18 proteins with effects on bone mineral density and fractures. One protein, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP2), showed robust evidence linking its higher levels to decreased bone density and increased risk of forearm fracture, highlighting TIMP2 as a promising new treatment target for osteoporosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→