The wall painting of the altar of the Nativity Cathedral at the Savvino-Storozhevsky Monastery: the reflection of the ancient program in the painting of the 19th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the insufficiently explored monumental painting of the Cathedral of Nativity of Theotokos in Savvino-Storozhevsky Monastery. The article examines the painting of the altar, which is located under the record of 1872–1873, and probably repeats the murals of 1649–1650. The subjects of the late pictorial layer are connected not so much with the monuments of the second quarter — the middle of the 17th century, but with the ensembles of the 14th —16th centuries. This is indicated by the compositions The Praise of the Theotokos, The Communion of the Apostles, The Holy of Row and compositions from the cycle of The Passion of Christ in the central altar conch, scenes from the life of Saint John the Baptist in the northern apse of the altar and scenes from the life of Saint Nicholas in the deacon. The only close analogue to the painting of the altar of the Cathedral of Nativity of Theotokos is the painting of the Trinity Cathedral at the Trinity-Saint Sergius Monastery in 1635, which reproduces the program of the 20s of the 15th century. Analysis of the existing painting of the altar of the Nativity Cathedral indicates a repetition of the program of 1649–1650, and a number of archaic features may indicate its connection with the ensemble of the first third of the 15th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".