MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of pre-acquisition stress on fear learning and regulation as a function of sex and menstrual-cycle groups

2025· article· en· W4417167921 on OpenAlexafffund
Jessie Provencher, Clémence Peyrot, Marie-Charlotte Beaulieu, Marie‐France Marin

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychoneuroendocrinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsExtinction (optical mineralogy)AnxietyStressorFear conditioningMenstrual cycleReactivity (psychology)Follicular phaseRecallSkin conductance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fear conditioning protocols are widely used to investigate fear learning and regulation, with clinical implications for post-traumatic stress and anxiety disorders. In real-world settings, fear learning often occurs under stress, affecting memory strength and regulation. However, laboratory findings on stress effects remain inconsistent, possibly due to the lack of consideration for sex and menstrual-cycle groups, given sex hormones receptors' abundance in fear- and stress-related brain regions. This study examined the impact of 1) pre-acquisition stress and 2) cortisol reactivity on fear processes across sex and menstrual-cycle groups (hormonal data unavailable). A total of 208 participants were exposed to a stressor (men (n = 24), women using oral contraceptives (OCs; n = 25), and women with a menstrual cycle in the early follicular (EF; n = 24) or late follicular phase (LF; n = 26)) or control condition (men (n = 29), OCs (n = 23), EF (n = 26), LF (n = 31)) before undergoing fear acquisition (Context A), where two colors were paired with shock (CS+) and another was not (CS-). On Day 2, one CS+ and the CS- were presented without shock (Context B) for fear extinction learning. On Day 3, extinction recall (Context B) and renewal (Context A) were tested, with all stimuli presented without shock. Fear responses were assessed by skin conductance responses (SCR) and self-reported shock anticipation. Stress-exposed participants showed lower SCR during fear acquisition than controls. During extinction learning, control men exhibited greater SCR reduction than stressed men, whereas LF women showed the opposite pattern. No group differences emerged during extinction recall. During renewal, stressed LF women had lower SCR to the CS+ than their control counterparts. Additional analyses suggested that stressed men with lower cortisol reactivity had higher SCR during fear acquisition and renewal than those with higher cortisol reactivity. These findings indicate that stress exposure and cortisol reactivity differentially influence fear learning and regulation across sex and menstrual-cycle groups, in a context-dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychoneuroendocrinologySame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207