MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417177100 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2025.12.009

Whole-rock Fe isotope compositions as mantle source and process tracers across the Hawaiian archipelago

2025· article· en· W4417177100 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole M. B. Williamson, Laura Bilenker, Dominique Weis

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBasaltIsotopeRadiogenic nuclideMantle (geology)Isotope fractionationSubaerialVolcanoIsotopic signatureLithophile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a geographically extensive Hawaiian Fe isotope dataset, with the primary goal of testing the use of stable Fe isotopes to identify mantle heterogeneities in the source of Hawaiian volcanoes, including whether the isotopically distinct Hawaiian geochemical groups (Loa, Kea, and Enriched Loa) exhibit distinct Fe isotope compositions. Hawai‘i is an excellent natural laboratory for assessing newer isotopic systems as it is well-studied and thoroughly geochemically characterized. We analyzed 43 carefully selected shield-stage tholeiitic basalt samples from 14 subaerial and submarine volcanoes that represent the past ∼ 5 Ma of volcanic activity along the Hawaiian chain. These samples have previously been thoroughly characterized for their major and trace element concentrations, and Pb, Sr, Nd, Hf, and Tl isotope compositions. Their compositions span the entire range of Kea, Loa and Enriched Loa Hawaiian geochemical groups. Iron isotope results reported to IRMM-14 vary from a δ 56 Fe (±2SD) of 0.00 (±0.06 ‰) to 0.21 (±0.02 ‰). The data adjusted for olivine fractionation show a similar range, and the mean δ 56 Fe of the new data (0.10 ± 0.10 ‰) overlaps with the average MORB value (∼0.10 ‰). This work provides the first comprehensive, large-scale overview of Fe isotope compositions in shield-stage tholeiitic basalt across the Hawaiian archipelago. Important observations include: 1) there is no statistical difference in δ 56 Fe values between Loa, Kea, and Enriched Loa geochemical groups; 2) δ 56 Fe and lithophile radiogenic isotope ratios (Pb, Sr, Nd, Hf) show no correlations; and 3) δ 56 Fe and ε 205 Tl (used to track the presence of recycled pelagic sediments in Hawaiian basalts) are not correlated. Hawaiian δ 56 Fe values are slightly lower than those from other enriched oceanic islands (EM-I, EM-II, HIMU), including Pitcairn, Azores, and Samoa, which is a feature also observed in Iceland. On a broader scale, these observations suggest that the mantle heterogeneities contributing to the unique radiogenic isotopic signatures in Hawaiian lavas, which are interpreted as being linked to the Pacific Large Low Shear Velocity Province, do not exhibit distinct or heavy Fe isotope compositions. Alternatively, if the deep mantle reservoirs sampled by the Hawaiian plume have distinct Fe isotope compositions, these signatures are not preserved during the ascent through the mantle, melting, and eruption at the surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207