Insights from a Ventilation-Aware Pandemic and Outbreak Risk model (VAPOR)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transmission of airborne pathogens in indoor spaces is strongly modulated by heterogeneity in ventilation. Understanding the role indoor air plays in pandemic risk is limited in part due to differing modeling approaches used in engineering and epidemiology. Here we present the VAPOR (Ventilation-Aware Pandemic and Outbreak Risk) model, a hybrid transmission framework that integrates Reed-Frost close-contact dynamics with Wells-Riley aerosol-mediated risk. Using a meta-population structure to simulate multi-patch environments (e.g., separate workplaces or schools), we explore how ventilation disparities shape epidemic potential. A fixed minority of individuals are modeled as "aerosolizers," consistent with overdispersed real-world transmission patterns (e.g., SARS-CoV-2). Simulations reveal that both improving ventilation in high-risk patches and raising baseline ventilation across environments independently reduces risk. Parameter sweeps across air changes per hour (ACH, 2-12) demonstrate non-linear benefits with early saturation. These findings emphasize the need for targeted ventilation strategies and show how small-world effects amplify heterogeneity-driven transmission. VAPOR offers a framework for linking ventilation equity to epidemic control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it