Prevalensi brucellosis pada ternak di jawa tengah: evaluasi metode rose bengal test dan complement fixation test di balai besar veteriner wates, yogyakarta (2024–2025)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brucellosis is a strategic zoonotic disease that significantly affects animal health, human health, and the livestock economy. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) as a screening method and the Complement Fixation Test (CFT) as a confirmatory diagnostic tool using serum samples collected from various districts and cities in Central Java. The research was conducted at the Regional Veterinary Laboratory (Balai Besar Veteriner) in Wates, Yogyakarta, from April to June 2025. A total of 3,393 serum samples were examined. The RBT results showed a higher number of reactive cases compared to the CFT outcomes; however, several reactive samples were not confirmed as positive upon retesting with the CFT. Boyolali recorded the highest number of confirmed cases (12 cases), followed by Kudus (6 cases), Batang (2 cases), and Banyumas (1 case). The findings demonstrate that RBT serves as a rapid and practical screening tool, yet confirmation through CFT remains essential to ensure diagnostic accuracy. These results emphasize the need for combining laboratory diagnostic methods with strict biosecurity implementation and livestock monitoring, particularly in densely populated farming areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".