MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417179777 · doi:10.1103/91xj-284t

Indirect measurement of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Sr</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Sr</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>91</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> reaction cross section and the implications for astrophysical Zr production

2025· article· en· W4417179777 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Greaves, D. Mücher, A. Spyrou, Pavel A. Denissenkov, Craig Harris, M. K. Smith, A. Sweet, D. L. Bleuel, P. A. DeYoung, A. C. Dombos, J. P. Gombas, E. Good, R. Lewis, S. N. Liddick, S. Lyons, F. Naqvi, A. Palmisano-Kyle, Cole Persch, A. Richard, E. K. Ronning, N. D. Scielzo, C. E. Svensson, Antonius Torode, W. W. von Seeger, M. Wiedeking, Yiming Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Guelph
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsNational Nuclear Security AdministrationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)ReplicateCross section (physics)NeutronProduction (economics)Function (biology)Stability (learning theory)Reduction (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intermediate neutron-capture process ($i$ process) has gained notable traction within the past decade as a way to describe stellar abundance observations which cannot be explained by the slow and rapid neutron-capture processes. Despite the general success of $i$-process models, many open questions remain. Among the observations, Zr stands out, as its elemental abundance is difficult to replicate with available $i$-process models, while the reactions that affect its production through the $i$ process are close enough to stability to study experimentally. Here, we present the experimental constraint of the nuclear level density and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-strength function ($\ensuremath{\gamma}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{SF}$) of $^{91}\mathrm{Sr}$ using the $\ensuremath{\beta}$-Oslo method, which were then input into the TALYS Hauser-Feshbach code to produce the first experimental constraint of the $^{90}\mathrm{Sr}(n,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{91}\mathrm{Sr}$ capture reaction. This constraint was used alongside that of $^{92}\mathrm{Sr}(n,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{93}\mathrm{Sr}$ for a reduction in the uncertainty of [Y/Zr] production in the $i$-process relevant environmental neutron density of ${10}^{13.5}$ and ${10}^{14.5} \text{neutrons}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{3}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207