EVALUASI PROFESIONAL GURU MATA PELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM YANG TELAH TERSERTIFIKASI DI KABUPATEN MANOKWARI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims First; to analyze the involvement of Islamic Religious Education teachers in becoming certified professional teachers in Manokwari Regency. Second; To analyze the impact of Islamic Religious Education teacher certification in realizing professional teachers in Manokwari Regency This study is Qualitative Descriptive. The research approach is phenomenology and sociology. The sources of research data are primary and secondary. Data collection uses observation, interview, and documentation methods. Data processing and analysis are through data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions.The results of the study show that First, the involvement of Islamic Religious Education teachers in realizing certified professional teachers in Manokwari Regency includes completeness of administrative documents, teacher competence, and involvement in teacher working groups and subject-teacher forums. Second, the impact of Islamic Religious Education teacher certification in realizing teacher professionalism in Manokwari Regency is the increase in the quality of education, the growth of teacher enthusiasm and motivation, and the improvement in teacher welfare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".