MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417180499 · doi:10.1080/25787489.2025.2599070

Impact of analytical treatment interruptions on sexual behaviors: a mixed-methods longitudinal study of women enrolled in an HIV cure–related trial in Durban, South Africa

2025· article· en· W4417180499 on OpenAlexaff
Karine Dubé, Makhosonke Ngcobo, Ali Ahmed, Maryam Hussain, Ntombifuthi Langa, Luyanda Maphalala, Vanessa Pillay, Maud Mthembu, Fang Wan, Whitney Tran, Rachel Lau, Jamila K. Stockman, Thumbi Ndung’u, Krista L. Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueHIV Research & Clinical Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityAIDS Vancouver
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of Mental HealthWellcome Trust
KeywordsLongitudinal studyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Clinical trialTransmission (telecommunications)Longitudinal dataPublic healthPopulationSexual behavior

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs) are increasingly used in HIV cure-related trials to assess intervention efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of participation in ATI-inclusive trials on sexual behaviors and transmission risks among women in Durban, South Africa, and to develop recommendations for safer trial design. METHODS: From 2022-2025, we conducted a mixed-methods socio-behavioral study embedded within a Phase 2A ATI-inclusive HIV cure-related trial. Nineteen participants completed surveys at four trial timepoints, baseline (T1), pre-ATI (T2), post-ATI (T3), and end of trial (T4), and in-depth interviews at the first three (T1-T3). We summarized quantitative data using medians and percentages and used the Theory of Planned Behavior to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: Participants had strong intentions toward HIV prevention; however, behaviors were inconsistently enacted during the trial. Condom use was highest during the ATI; however, 40% of participants reported never using condoms. Abstinence was not considered an acceptable option within relationships. Disclosure of HIV and ATI participation facilitated prevention behavior but was undermined by HIV-related stigma, while non-disclosure and new sexual behaviors created relationship instability. Prevention was supported by trial staff's responsiveness and close monitoring, which helped build participants' trust. CONCLUSIONS: For ATI-inclusive trials to reduce HIV transmission risk and social harms, investigators must understand contextual barriers perceived by participants who are expected to enact protective behaviors. Adaptive trial designs that incorporate participant-centered behavioral support, monitor and address emergent harms and facilitate prevention through access to HIV testing and PrEP for partners, must align with participants' evolving realities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.309
GPT teacher head0.638
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHIV Research & Clinical PracticeSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207