MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417181478 · doi:10.64149/j.ver.8.19s.36-46

Cognitive Impairments In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical And Biochemical Correlations

2025· article· W4417181478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVascular and Endovascular Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentType 2 Diabetes MellitusCognitionAdiponectinType 2 diabetesRepeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological StatusNeuropsychologyGlycated hemoglobinDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Cognitive impairments are increasingly recognized as significant complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), adversely affecting daily functioning, treatment adherence, and quality of life. Recent evidence suggests that metabolic dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and neuroinflammatory mechanisms contribute to the development of cognitive decline in diabetic patients. However, the interplay between biochemical markers such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), adiponectin, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) and neuropsychological performance remains insufficiently explored. Objective. To evaluate the clinical and biochemical correlations of cognitive impairments in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus using standardized neuropsychological tests and serum biomarker levels. Methods. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Tashkent State Medical University from 2022 to 2024. The study included four groups: (1) T2DM with mild cognitive impairment; (2) T2DM with dementia; (3) T2DM without cognitive impairment; (4) healthy controls. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Stroop Test, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Serum HbA1c, total adiponectin, and sVCAM-1 levels were measured using ELISA. Statistical analyses included correlation tests and regression modeling. Results. Patients with T2DM and cognitive impairment demonstrated significantly higher HbA1c and sVCAM-1 levels and lower adiponectin levels compared with both diabetic patients without cognitive impairment and healthy controls (p < 0.05). MoCA and FAB scores showed strong inverse correlations with HbA1c (r = –0.52, p < 0.01) and sVCAM-1 (r = –0.47, p < 0.01). Adiponectin demonstrated a positive correlation with cognitive scores (r = +0.44, p < 0.01). These findings support the concept of metabolic–vascular–neuroinflammatory interplay in diabetic cognitive dysfunction. Conclusion. Cognitive decline in T2DM is closely linked with biochemical alterations such as elevated HbA1c and sVCAM-1 and reduced adiponectin. These biomarkers may serve as early indicators of cognitive impairment and should be incorporated into comprehensive assessment strategies for diabetic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVascular and Endovascular Review→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→