MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417182801 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf347

The association between STOPPFall medication use and orthostatic hypotension in community-dwelling older people

2025· article· en· W4417182801 on OpenAlexaff
Kate Doyle, Siobhán Scarlett, Frank Moriarty, Amanda Lavan, Rose Anne Kenny, Robert Briggs

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlder peopleOrthostatic vital signsMedical prescriptionAssociation (psychology)Syncope (phonology)Elderly people

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs), identified by the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk (STOPPFall), may increase fall risk by causing orthostatic hypotension (OH).This study investigates the association between STOPPFall medication use and OH in community-dwelling older people ≥65 years using data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). METHODS: Orthostatic blood pressure (BP) was measured by active stand using a Finometer. STOPPFall medications were recorded at TILDA Waves 1 & 3.Delayed BP recovery was defined by a reduction in systolic BP (sBP) ≥20 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 10 mmHg from baseline at 30 seconds after standing, 'any OH' a similar BP reduction at either 30, 60, 90 or 120 seconds post-stand, and classical OH by persistent reduction in sBP at all timepoints (30-120 seconds) post-stand.Regression models assessed the association between STOPPFall medications and OH and orthostatic sBP changes. RESULTS: One STOPPFall medication was prescribed in 26.9% (403/1499) of participants; 10.6% (159/1499) were prescribed ≥2 STOPPFall medications.Prescription of ≥2 STOPPFall medications was independently associated with delayed BP recovery [odds ratio (OR) 1.88 (95% CI 1.25-2.82); P = .003], 'any OH' [OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.00-2.18); P = .048], and classical OH [OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.13-3.78); P = .018], and was associated with significantly lower sBP at 30- [coefficient -7.91(95% CI -10.22 to -5.60); P < .001], 60- [coefficient -5.55(95% CI -7.86 to -3.24); P < .001], 90- [coefficient -2.63(95% CI -4.95 to -0.32); P = .026], and 120 seconds [coefficient - 3.67(95% CI -5.98 to -1.36); P = .002].Increasing STOPPFall medication at Wave 3 was associated with significantly lower sBP at 30 seconds [coefficient -3.22(95% CI -5.73 to -0.72); P = .012]. CONCLUSION: Prescription of ≥2 STOPPFall medications was associated with significantly delayed BP recovery post-stand and OH. This highlights that rationalising STOPPFall medications is indicated in older people with OH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207