MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417183683 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70534

Does tenodesis of tensor fascia latae with hip abductors after proximal femoral resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction lead to functional improvements?

2025· article· en· W4417183683 on OpenAlex
Ariane Lavoie-Hudon, Jean-Philippe Cloutier, Norbert Dion, Simon Laurendeau, Philippe Corbeil, Annie Arteau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversité LavalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFascia lataOrthopedic surgeryResectionFasciaTensor (intrinsic definition)Modular designLead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Trendelenburg gait is a common consequence of proximal femoral oncologic resection. To mitigate limping, tensor fascia latae (TFL) tenodesis is employed by suturing the muscle to the abductor mechanism, repaired to the trochanteric portion of the endoprosthesis. Objective functional evaluation of this technique has not been conducted. This study aimed to determine (1) whether the procedure induces tensor fascia latae hypertrophy, (2) its impact on functional outcomes and (3) its effect on gait patterns. Methods: Sixteen patients who underwent proximal femoral resection and modular endoprosthesis reconstruction were assessed via computed tomography scans at least 1 year post-operatively for TFL and hip abductor hypertrophy and fatty infiltration. Patients were separated into two groups based on the presence or absence of TFL hypertrophy. Patient-related outcomes were evaluated with questionnaires, and a subset of seven patients underwent hip abductor strength measurement and gait analysis to assess objective function. Gait analysis included kinematics as well as electromyography. Results: At 1 year, half of the cohort demonstrated TFL hypertrophy. A trend towards improved functional scores was observed in the hypertrophy group. Hip kinematics indicated a greater adduction (max of 7.2 ± 4.1° vs. 2.8 ± 2.6°, 88% difference) in the hypertrophy group, resulting in an increased pelvic drop during single-limb support (5.2 ± 3.1° in the hypertrophy group and 3.4 ± 3.7° in the no hypertrophy group, 42% difference). Gluteus medius activation tended to be slightly greater during the stance phase for the no hypertrophy group, while the TFL was most activated in the hypertrophy group in the same period. Conclusion: The TFL tenodesis led to satisfactory functional outcomes for patients with proximal femoral reconstruction, whether they developed hypertrophy or not. TFL hypertrophy was not associated with a more favourable gait pattern, despite positive self-evaluated function. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it