MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417186415 · doi:10.1186/s13071-025-07142-x

First report of Trichinella chanchalensis, and detection of foreign Trichinella spiralis, in wildlife in Alaska

2025· article· en· W4417186415 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cody J. Malone, Kimberlee B. Beckmen, Raphaela Stimmelmayr, Vladislav A. Lobanov, Maarten J. Voordouw, Jayne Ellis, Emily Jenkins

Bibliographic record

VenueParasites & Vectors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersWeston Family FoundationWestern College of Veterinary Medicine, University of SaskatchewanPolar Knowledge CanadaAgricultural Research ServiceCanadian Food Inspection AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMassachusetts Department of Fish and GameAlaska Department of Fish and GameU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceArcticNetU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsWildlifeTrichinellaParasitologyTrichinella spiralisEntomologyAnimal ecologyHelminthsTrichinosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Trichinella are muscle-dwelling zoonotic parasites of global importance for public health, animal husbandry, and trade. Trichinella chanchalensis (T13) is the newest species in the genus, first described in the Yukon and the Northwest Territories, for which the geographical distribution remains unknown due to limitations of the gold standard test for genotyping (multiplex polymerase chain reaction [PCR]). Our primary objective was to determine whether T. chanchalensis was present in Alaska, using a new molecular method that enables the description of the prevalence, co-infection, host associations, and risk factors for Trichinella spp. infection in wild carnivores. METHODS: Trichinella spp. larvae were recovered through artificial digestion of muscle and genotyped using next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Trichinella spp. larvae were detected in 53/157 (34%) animals, namely wolverines (Gulo gulo), arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans), wolves (Canis lupus), brown bears (Ursus arctos), and polar bears (Ursus maritimus), but not in black bears (Ursus americanus) or lynx (Lynx canadensis). Prevalence was highest in polar bears and wolverines, while intensity (larvae per gram, LPG) was highest in red foxes, arctic foxes, and wolves. Most animals (65%) harbored single infections with Trichinella nativa, followed by mixed infections of T. nativa and Trichinella T6 (33%). A single wolverine was infected with T. nativa, T6, and T. chanchalensis. Combining NGS with statistical methods, we found no evidence of competition between T. nativa and T6 in host muscles. Trichinella spp. infection (primarily T. nativa) was the highest in the Northwestern region, whereas T6 infection probability was higher in the Interior and Southern regions, suggesting differences in environmental resistance even among these three taxa. In a single, highly infected brown bear, we detected a rare case of Trichinella spiralis of foreign origin based on whole-genome sequencing, suggesting illegal importation and disposal of meat. CONCLUSIONS: We report a new geographical record for T. chanchalensis and a rare finding of T. spiralis in North American wildlife, and demonstrate the utility of new NGS methods for describing the ecology of parasites maintained in wildlife hosts commonly presenting as co-infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParasites & VectorsSame topicParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207