CTX-M-Producing Escherichia coli: History, Molecular Epidemiology and Laboratory Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: From being a curiosity in the 1990s, CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli invaded most parts of the globe during the 2000s and 2010s, with multidrug-resistant (MDR) clone ST131 and CTX-M-15 leading the charge. The most widely distributed CTX-M types, with the highest global frequencies (up to 70% in certain lower- and middle-income countries), are CTX-M-15, CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-27. E. coli isolates with bla CTX-M-27 are currently emerging globally. The worldwide ascendancy of E. coli with bla CTX-M genes occurred via the spread of IncF plasmids between isolates and the existence of certain successful clones (eg, ST131) that acted as repositories for these genes. This is an impressive “gene survival strategy” that aided with the endurance of bla CTX-M in different environments, including the community and hospitals. The detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli (including CTX-M isolates) in clinical laboratories is reasonably straightforward. However, different methodologies (eg, immunogenic and genomic) have recently become available to specifically identify CTX-Ms in bacterial isolates as well as human specimens. The role of such tests is currently unclear. E. coli with CTX-M β-lactamases have indirectly been driving the carbapenemase pandemic and are forces to be reckoned with. Keywords: Escherichia coli , CTX-M β-lactamases, MDR high-risk clones, ST131
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it