MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417188197 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107617

Air Pollution Mixture and Folate Status Indicators among Pregnant Women in Canada: Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) Study, 2008 to 2011

2025· article· en· W4417188197 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tyler Smith, Hachem Saddiki, Joseph M. Braun, Amanda J MacFarlane, Éric Lavigne, Markey Johnson, Ana Maria Siega-Riz, Raji Balasubramanian, Mandy Fisher, R. Thomas Zoeller, Jillian Ashley‐Martin, Tye E. Arbuckle, Bruce P. Lanphear, Youssef Oulhote

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityCarleton UniversityUniversity of OttawaHealth Canada
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Canada
KeywordsAir pollutionAir pollutantsPregnancyAir quality indexEnvironmental pollutionPollution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundFolic acid (FA) has been reported to modify associations between air pollutants and autism, but no study has investigated whether air pollutants are associated with maternal folate status. ObjectiveWe estimated associations between an air pollution mixture and maternal folate status among pregnant women in Canada. MethodsWe enrolled pregnant women (n=1,983) in 10 cities in Canada from 2008 to 2011 in a prospective cohort.We estimated mean daily concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) at maternal residences for 180 days preceding first and third trimester visits (ranges: 6-14 and 32-34 gestational weeks, respectively).At both visits, we measured plasma 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, unmetabolized folic acid, and nonmethylated folate concentrations (5MTHF, UMFA, NMF) and proportions (%5MTHF, %UMFA, %NMF).We used Bayesian weighted quantile sum regression to estimate expected differences in folate measures per one-quartile difference in the air pollution mixture and weights for the mixture components.We stratified by fetal sex and FA supplementation. ResultsAmong complete cases in the first and third trimesters (n=927 and 838, respectively), median (IQR) plasma total folate was similar between the first trimester (96.9 [78.6, 119.0] nmol/L) and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f the third trimester (99.6 [76.0, 135.0] nmol/L).In the third but not the first trimester, the mixture was positively associated with plasma total folate (12.0 nmol/L per one-quartile increase, 95% CI: 1.5, 22.7 nmol/L), negatively associated with %5MTHF (-2.8, 95% CI: -5.1,-0.70),and positively associated with %UMFA (13.4,95% CI: 4.4, 23.0).O3 was the primary component (weights 0.4).Associations were stronger for women with female fetuses. ConclusionAir pollution was positively associated with total folate concentrations and UMFA proportions and negatively associated with 5MTHF proportions.Associations were strongest in the third trimester and among pregnant women carrying female fetuses.Air pollution may influence maternal folate status during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207