MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417190225 · doi:10.16922/25years.education

Twenty-Five Years of Devolved Education in Wales

2025· book· W4417190225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Moira Hulme, Lisa Taylor, Paul McFlynn, Alexandra Morgan, Mark Connolly, Emmajane Milton, Matt Hutt, Kelly Smith, Ken Jones, Kevin Smith, Gwilym Siôn ap Gruffudd, Elin Haf Gruffydd Jones, Carmel Conn, Megan Hicks, David Vittle Thomas, Trevor Mutton, Thomas Breeze, Sarah Stewart, Natalie Macdonald, Jane Waters, Cheryl Ellis, Rosy Ellis, Laura E Dobson, Sheena O'Leary, Andrea Williams, Jeremy Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Wales Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCardiff Metropolitan UniversityUlster UniversityCardiff University
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)CurriculumFoundation (evidence)Policy makingDomain (mathematical analysis)Education policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Wales marks a quarter of a century of devolved policymaking in education, this edited volume celebrates the successes of – and grapples critically with the ongoing challenges faced by – Wales’s education system. Researchers from across the UK education landscape pose critical questions: about the leadership of reform; about where responsibility lies for the successful implementation of a number of post-devolution policy innovations, such as the Foundation Phase and the Curriculum for Wales; about the nature and ownership of accountability; about how professionals can best be developed and supported to deliver the current ambitious reform journey; and about a great deal more. In answer to the recurring question of ‘by whom shall Wales be raised’, this volume suggests the responsibility lies with all of us, at every level and in every domain of an education system that is unrecognisable from that which preceded devolution, and which today continues to evolve apace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Wales Press eBooksSame topicGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207