MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417192854 · doi:10.1139/jpn-25-0078

EEG microstate and functional connectivity analyses for differentiating suicide attempt from suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder

2025· article· en· W4417192854 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hyeon-Ho Hwang, Sungkean Kim, Se-Hoon Shim, Ji Sun Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSoonchunhyang UniversityKorea Brain Research Institute
KeywordsMinistateSuicidal ideationMajor depressive disorderElectroencephalographySuicide attemptFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Suicide remains a critical public health issue, with self-report-based clinical assessments often failing to detect imminent risk. This study aimed to identify objective electroencephalography (EEG)-based neurobiological markers for differentiating a suicide attempt (SA) from suicidal ideation (SI) using EEG microstate and microstate-based functional connectivity (FC) analyses. Methods: From 2017 to 2020, this study enrolled 130 medication-naïve major depressive disorder patients (68 SA, evaluated within 7 days of the attempt; 62 SI) at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital. Resting-state EEG data were analyzed using microstate analysis to explore temporal dynamics of brain topography and microstate-based FC to assess connectivity in theta, alpha, and beta bands. Correlations between EEG features and psychological measures (e.g., suicidal ideation, depression, emotion regulation) were examined. Results: Compared with the SI group, the SA group showed a marginally lower frequency of occurrence for microstates A (auditory/language processing) and B (visual processing) ( p = 0.078 for both). The SA group demonstrated significantly higher alpha-band FC during microstate E (linked to the default mode network (DMN)) for several electrode pairs (e.g., F7–C5, p = 0.009; FC5–C5, p = 0.005). The SA group also exhibited marginally higher FC in the alpha band during microstates C (DMN-related) and B, and in the theta band during microstate E. A subsequent within-group analysis revealed that in the SI group, alpha-band FC during microstate E positively correlated with scores for difficulties in emotion regulation ( r = 0.433, p = 0.017). Limitations: Findings are limited by potential physiological confounds in the SA group and by the limited anatomical specificity inherent in sensor-space EEG analysis. Conclusion: EEG microstate dynamics and microstate-based FC differ between patients with SA and SI. Specifically, enhanced alpha-band connectivity during microstate E in the SA group potentially reflects condition-specific DMN functions. These EEG-based measures show promise as objective markers that complement clinical suicide risk assessment and inform early intervention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience→Same topicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies→French-language works237,207→