MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417193370 · doi:10.3390/children12121675

A Canadian Advanced Physiotherapist Practitioner Shared-Care Model in Pediatric Rheumatology Offers Safe and Quality Care in the Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis—Comparing Key Performance Indicators with the PR-COIN Registry

2025· article· en· W4417193370 on OpenAlexafffundabout
J. Lynwood Herrington, Patrick Clarkin, Jade Singleton, Karen Beattie, Sheetal S. Vora, Katelyn Banschbach, Catherine A. Bingham, Tania Cellucci, Danielle C. Fair, Mileka Gilbert, Beth S. Gottlieb, Julia G. Harris, Liane Heale, Tzielan Lee, Melissa L. Mannion, Edward J. Oberle, Nancy Pan, Jonathan Park, M. Toth, Jennifer E. Weiss, Michelle Batthish

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
FundersChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteSeattle Children's Research InstituteHamilton Health Sciences
KeywordsPerformance indicatorRheumatologyDocumentationQuality managementQuality (philosophy)DemographicsDiseaseArthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Canadian Advanced Physiotherapist Practitioner (APP) roles have existed for over 25 years in pediatric rheumatology. The APP can manage many common pediatric rheumatic conditions most often in Shared-Care Models (SCMs) with pediatric rheumatologists (PRs). The quality of care children receive in an APP SCM compared to traditional care is unknown. The Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) tracks quality measures as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) care. This study aimed to analyze the frequency of KPIs documented in a pediatric rheumatology APP SCM from a single center and compare to PR-COIN’s performance targets to assess the quality and safety of care. Methods: A retrospective chart review of JIA cases managed in a pediatric rheumatology APP SCM over a 2-year period was conducted. KPIs for disease activity, safety monitoring and access to care were evaluated. Frequency of KPI documentation by the APP were compared to target performance goals (≥40, ≥70 or ≥80% documentation rate depending on KPI) and with PR-COIN data from the Same Center (SC) (three rheumatologists) and PR-COIN (15 centers). Results: Documented KPIs were compared between the APP SCM, SC and PR-COIN registry (138; 140; 11,431 eligible visits, respectively) between June 2022–May 2024. Demographics were similar between groups. Increased percentages of patients with polyarticular rheumatoid factor positive and psoriatic subtypes were seen by APP compared to SC and PR-COIN. Documentation frequency of all disease activity and safety monitoring KPI performance goals were either higher in the APP SCM or comparable to SC and PR-COIN. Conclusions: The pediatric rheumatology APP SCM exceeded PR-COIN performance goals for KPI documentation, establishing a high level of quality and safety of care for children with JIA when managed in this model of care. Next steps include replicating this study in other pediatric rheumatology centers with an APP SCM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildrenSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207