MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417201462 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000202

The psychosocial impact of exercise as an intervention for persons living with obesity and female infertility: A rapid scoping review and pilot study

2025· article· en· W4417201462 on OpenAlexaff
Tiffany Furneaux, Jillian Murdoch, Nicole Hollohan, C. M. Barrett, Deanna Murphy, Alison Farrell, Erin McGowan, Laurie Twells, Katie P. Wadden

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS mental health. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)InfertilityObesityAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persons living with obesity and experiencing infertility are counselled on healthy behaviours, such as increasing physical activity levels, to improve fertility-related outcomes. However, due to the known psychological burden of receiving an infertility diagnosis, there is an important need to consider the psychosocial impact of administering exercise programming for this population. This study aims to assess the psychosocial impact of exercise-based interventions on individuals with obesity and infertility through a rapid scoping review and a pilot study. The rapid scoping review was conducted in MedLine, Embase, and CINAHL. Studies involving exercise-based lifestyle interventions for people with obesity and infertility were included only if they measured a psychosocial outcome as a primary or secondary measure. Expanding upon evidence from our rapid review, a pre-experimental feasibility study (pre-test, post-test with one group) was conducted. The pilot study implemented a virtual exercise intervention for people with obesity and experiencing infertility. Questionnaires measuring anxiety and depression, quality of life (QoL), social support, fertility-related stress, and hopelessness were administered. Based on the nine articles from our rapid review, there is evidence that lifestyle interventions combining exercise, diet, and psychobehavioral components improve psychosocial outcomes like anxiety, depression, QoL, and self-esteem. In our pilot study, 11 participants (Age: 34 ± 3.7, BMI: 40.3 ± 4.54) engaged in the virtual exercise intervention, and seven completed the post-intervention questionnaires. The results of our pilot study showed improvements in depression, hopelessness, physical QoL, and fertility-related stress scores. However, we observed declines in anxiety, mental QoL, and perceived social support measures. Our mixed findings may be due to the unique context of our pilot study. The study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, where increased stress, anxiety, and isolation, negatively impacted fertility patients. Additionally, the virtual intervention, required by restrictions, may have reduced social interaction and support, worsening one's mental health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS mental health.Same topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207