MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Botulinum Toxin for Refractory Digital Ischemia and Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis

2025· article· en· W4417201907 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Zhu, Katya Peri, Catherine Silotch, Connor Prosty, Hessah BinJadeed, Anastasiya Muntyanu, Mahalakshmi Nagarajan, Paul McArthur, Andrea Benedetti, Elena Netchiporouk

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)IschemiaBotulinum toxinProspective cohort studySystemic administrationClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Acute digital ischemia, digital ulcers, and gangrene are debilitating complications of systemic sclerosis and other vasculopathies and are often refractory to standard vasodilator and immunosuppressive therapies. Botulinum toxin (BTX) has emerged as a potential rescue therapy, but its clinical effectiveness and safety remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BTX injections for ischemic digital complications and identify predictors of treatment response using individual participant data (IPD). Data Sources: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus were searched from inception through April 20, 2024. Study Selection: Eligible studies included patients who presented with acute digital ischemia, ischemic digital ulcers, or gangrene. Studies were limited to Raynaud disease without digital ulcers or gangrene were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened articles using Covidence, with discrepancies resolved by consensus with the senior author. Of 116 studies screened, 31 (27%) met inclusion criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted in duplicate and study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was complete response (CR), which was defined as resolution of ischemia or ulcer healing. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and time to response. Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with CR. Results: This systematic review and IPD meta-analysis included 119 patients (72 female individuals [75.0%]; mean [SD] age, 49.0 [15.1] years). BTX was associated with high CR rates for ischemia (93.1%), ulcers (90.1%), and gangrene (87.5%). Adverse events were infrequent, with transient muscle weakness (7.6%) and injection site pain (5.9%) being most common. No associated factors reached statistical significance in multivariable models, but autoimmune etiology and younger age were associated with faster response in Kaplan-Meier analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this systematic review and IPD meta-analysis suggest that BTX injections appear to be a safe and effective adjunct for refractory digital ischemia in systemic sclerosis. Prospective trials are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize administration protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA DermatologySame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207