MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract C001: Novel Sex-Specific Metabolic Phenotypes in Early Onset Colorectal Cancer

2025· article· en· W4417202165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oladimeji Aladelokun, Abhishek Jain, Xinyi Shen, Samuel D. Butensky, Allison Janak, Domenica Berardi, Reza Aalizadeh, Sunny Siddique, Xiaomei Ma, Philip B. Paty, Rolando García-Milian, Alison Berner, Jatin Roper, Sajid Khan, Caroline H. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerProportional hazards modelHazard ratioCohortMetabolomicsMetaboliteCancerIncidence (geometry)Multivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The overall incidence of late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC, ≥50 years old) has decreased. However, the rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC, <50 years old) have steadily increased, posing a major public health concern as EOCRC patients typically have poorer clinical outcomes. Sex-specific factors, including hormones and metabolites, have been underexplored as potential therapeutic targets for EOCRC. Aim: We propose that male and female EOCRC patients exhibit different metabolic responses in their colorectal tumors, which could have significant implications for personalized treatment approaches. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive metabolomics analysis on surgically resected colorectal tumors and matched adjacent normal mucosa from EOCRC and LOCRC patients (n=372). Disease-specific survival analysis was performed for individual patients. To determine the influence of sex and metabolite abundance on tumor progression, we employed multivariate Cox proportional hazard and early-late index models. We further validated the clinical significance of our findings using independent datasets from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (n=582 patients), and a retrospective validation cohort from the SEER database (n=79506 EOCRC patients). Results: Our discovery and validation cohorts revealed that male patients had significantly worse disease-specific survival in EOCRC. Metabolomic analysis revealed distinct metabolic sub-phenotypes influenced by sex. Younger male patients exhibited worse disease-specific survival compared to LOCRC, even after adjusting for the stage of CRC. Tumors from younger male patients showed enhanced amino acid utilization, characterized by increased asparagine and tryptophan metabolism, and increased fatty acid uptake to fuel growth. Independent validation revealed that high asparagine synthetase (ASNS) expression correlated with age in male EOCRC patients only. Conclusion: Modulating sex-biased tumor metabolomes may represent a potentially effective targeted strategy for the prevention and treatment of EOCRC in both men and women. Citation Format: Oladimeji Aladelokun, Abhishek Jain, Xinyi Shen, Samuel Butensky, Shiying Xiao, Allison Janak, Domenica Berardi, Carol Yang, Reza Aalizadeh, Sunny Siddique, Xiaomei Ma, Philip Paty, Rolando Garcia-Milian, Alison Berner, Jatin Roper, Sajid Khan, Caroline Johnson. Novel Sex-Specific Metabolic Phenotypes in Early Onset Colorectal Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr C001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.517
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207