MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417205558 · doi:10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.105857

Progressive Fibrosis in Hydroxychloroquine Cardiomyopathy Mimicking Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Cardiac Amyloidosis

2025· article· en· W4417205558 on OpenAlexaff
Zainab Altaha, Xi Zhao, Yinong Wang, Nowell M. Fine, Omid Kiamanesh, Robert J.H. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertrophic cardiomyopathyHydroxychloroquineCardiomyopathyFibrosisCardiac amyloidosisCardiotoxicityScintigraphyMyocardial fibrosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of hydroxychloroquine cardiotoxicity is crucial given its potential reversibility; however, the diagnosis can be complicated by imaging findings that overlap with other infiltrative cardiomyopathies, including cardiac amyloidosis. CASE SUMMARY: A 62-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus on hydroxychloroquine therapy (>15 years, cumulative dose: >2000 g) presented with progressive heart failure. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed over 5 years showed evolution from extensive myocardial fibrosis (37%) to infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Technetium-99m-pyrophosphate scintigraphy demonstrated diffuse myocardial uptake. Endomyocardial biopsy confirmed hydroxychloroquine cardiotoxicity and the absence of amyloid involvement by Congo red staining. DISCUSSION: This case documents the 5-year imaging evolution of hydroxychloroquine cardiotoxicity, representing a rare cause of false-positive pyrophosphate scintigraphy. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Hydroxychloroquine cardiotoxicity should be considered when pyrophosphate scintigraphy is positive in patients with long-term exposure. Early recognition (before extensive fibrosis develops) is critical, as the likelihood of recovery diminishes with advanced disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Case ReportsSame topicDrug-Induced Ocular ToxicityFrench-language works237,207