MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417206910 · doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2025.103155

HTRS2025.O8C.3 Alfa-PROTECT: A Phase 3, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in Previously Treated Children Aged 7 to <12 Years With Severe Hemophilia A

2025· article· en· W4417206910 on OpenAlexaff
Margareth C. Ozelo, Luigi Di Matteo, Heidi Glosli, Kaan Kavaklı, Nasrin Samji, Gregory C. Makris, Luciana Correa Oliveira de Oliveira, Shveta Gupta, Guillermo Arbesú, Mauro Dávoli, Maria Elisa Mancuso

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialPhase (matter)Incidence (geometry)Phases of clinical researchMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The effectiveness of damoctocog alfa pegol for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A was demonstrated in the PROTECT VIII Kids trial (NCT01775618). Children aged < 12 years were excluded from damoctocog alfa pegol’s initial marketing authorization application because of observed loss of efficacy and/or hypersensitivity reactions occurring within the first 4 exposure days (EDs) in some children aged < 6 years due to an immune response to PEG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and HaemostasisSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207