Loss of Y chromosome in Alzheimer’s patients co-occurs with somatic mutations beyond CHIP drivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Loss of Y chromosome (LOY) and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) are common age-related events with implications for aging and Alzheimer disease (AD). LOY is linked to increased AD risk, whereas CHIP may be protective, and their co-occurrence remains unclear. We conducted whole-exome sequencing of CD4 + T cells, NK cells, and myeloid cells from AD patients and controls exhibiting LOY or retention of Y chromosome. We identified 39 variants in known myeloid and lymphoid driver genes, with up to 35% co-occurring with LOY in the same clone. In addition, we detected 192 unknown drivers of clonal hematopoiesis, enriched in AD-LOY individuals (odds ratio 4.8, P = 0.041). In myeloid cells, total driver burden correlated with LOY (ρ = 0.52, P = 0.00041). These results indicate that LOY is a primary driver of clonal hematopoiesis in AD, seeding myeloid clones that accumulate unknown driver variants, whereas most canonical CHIP mutations arise independently. Our study reveals distinct, partially overlapping clonal architectures for LOY and CHIP and highlights LOY-driven myeloid expansion as a contributor to AD pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".