Manifold Learning for Olfactory Habituation to Strongly Fluctuating Backgrounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Animals rely on their sense of smell to survive, but important olfactory cues are mixed with confounding background odors that fluctuate due to atmospheric turbulence. It is unclear how the olfactory system habituates to such stochastic backgrounds to detect behaviorally important odors. Here, we explicitly consider the high-dimensional nature of odor coding, the natural statistics of odor fluctuations, and the architecture of the early olfactory pathway. We show that their combination favors a manifold learning mechanism for olfactory habituation over alternatives based on predictive filtering. Manifold learning is implemented in our model by a biologically plausible network of inhibitory interneurons in the early olfactory pathway. We demonstrate that plasticity rules based on the Intrator, Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (IBCM) model or an online principal components analysis algorithm are effective at implementing this mechanism in turbulent conditions and outperform previous models relying on mean background subtraction. Interneurons with an IBCM plasticity rule acquire selectivity to independently varying odors. This manifold learning mechanism offers a path toward distinguishing plasticity rules in experiments and could be leveraged by other biological circuits facing fluctuating environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".