Activation Energy and Kinetics of First Hydrogenation in Ti<sub>48.8</sub>Fe<sub>46.0</sub>Mn<sub>5.2 </sub>Alloy Produced by Gas Atomization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first hydrogenation behavior of the gas atomized Ti48.8Fe46.0Mn5.2 alloy was system-ically investigated. The as-received powder showed no hydrogen absorption due to the long air exposure before the hydrogenation tests. To overcome this, 5 passes of cold rolling were employed as an activation strategy. Cold rolling introduced cracks and defects that facilitated hydrogen diffusion, enabling the alloy to successfully absorb hydrogen. The influences of temperature, constant driving force, and hydrogen pressure on the first hydrogenation were evaluated. The results indicated that the first hydro-genation follows an Arrhenius behavior, with calculated activation energies of 69 and 57 kJ/mol H2. The observed difference in activation energies is likely associated with the variation of the driving force under constant pressure conditions. The pre-exponential factor (A) was found to be pressure-dependent, following the equation A = A₀ (P/P₀)1.8, where A₀ = 1.3 × 106 s⁻¹.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".