MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417213592 · doi:10.1080/19396368.2025.2590747

A novel sperm FcR binding assay that assesses sperm fertilizing potential

2025· article· en· W4417213592 on OpenAlex
Barb Cohen, John R. Walsh, Zimu Chen, Sergey I. Moskovtsev, Erin M. Schnellinger, Martin Kathrins, H. Nadir Çıray, Larry I. Lipshultz, Paul J. Turek, Clifford Librach

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility Centre
FundersPurdue University
KeywordsSpermCapacitationInseminationAcrosome reactionHuman fertilizationArtificial inseminationAcrosomeSemen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freshly ejaculated mammalian sperm have poor fertilizing ability, with fertility only gained after sperm undergo capacitation and the acrosome reaction. To visualize exposed Fc receptors (FcRs), which occur during the acrosome reaction and whose absence has been related to infertility, a novel sperm FcR binding assay (FcR assay) was developed to assess fertilizing potential of sperm in proof-of-concept studies. A competition binding assay between sperm FcR and exogenously added FcR was used to assess whether the FcR was a functioning ligand in bull sperm. Once FcR was confirmed as a functional ligand, time-based expression of FcR was then evaluated in bull and human sperm using the FcR assay. This FcR assay was then used to evaluate fertility outcomes in cattle with cryopreserved intrauterine insemination (IUI) sperm, and to evaluate sperm FcR expression in patients undergoing IUI treatment in a prospective observational study. Time-based analyses of ejaculates from bull and human sperm demonstrated characteristic, reproducible sinusoidal patterns of FcR expression that corresponded to high and low periods of fertility potential in each species. The pregnancy rate in cattle approached statistical significance using the FcR assay results to inform optimum insemination timing windows versus conventional untimed methods (73.0% vs. 68.4%, respectively; p = 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98, 1.57) with a 4.4% increase in the overall pregnancy rate. In patients undergoing IUI treatment, FcR expression patterns were identified where sperm were at their optimal fertilizing state, with overall pregnancy rates increasing from 21% to 42% (p = 0.01) when inseminations occurred during the windows where the fertilizing potential of the sperm was deemed optimal. These results suggest that sperm fertility potential is quantifiable in semen samples using our novel sperm FcR assay. Importantly, the FcR assay has the ability to identify optimal fertility windows in real-time, and also in the procedure ejaculates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it