MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417217158 · doi:10.2196/84318

Advancing Psychiatric Safety With the Predictive Risk Identification for Mental Health Events Tool: Retrospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4417217158 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Elham Dolatabadi, Valentina Tamayo Velasquez, Abdul Hamid Dabboussi, David Wen, Jennifer Crawford, Andrea Waddell, Christo El Morr

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Mental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsNorth York General HospitalOntario Tech UniversityWaypoint Centre for Mental Health CareVector InstituteUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthRetrospective cohort studyIdentification (biology)Cohort studyEquity (law)MEDLINERisk assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patient safety incidents are a leading cause of harm in psychiatric settings, yet early warning systems (EWS) tailored to mental health remain underdeveloped. Traditional risk tools such as the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression-Inpatient Version (DASA-IV) offer limited predictive accuracy and are reactive rather than proactive. OBJECTIVE: We introduce the Predictive Risk Identification for Mental Health Events (PRIME) tool, a deep learning-based EWS trained on longitudinal psychiatric electronic medical record (EMR) data to anticipate adverse events in 24-hour windows. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected EMR data to train and validate machine learning (ML) models for short-term risk prediction was conducted. This study took place at Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, a large inpatient psychiatric hospital in Ontario, Canada, serving both high-security forensic and nonforensic patient populations. A total of 4651 patients and 403,098 encounters from January 2020 to August 2024 were included. For model evaluation, the 2024 test set included 900 patients and 48,313 encounters. PRIME was trained using recurrent neural networks with attention mechanisms on multivariate time-series data. The model used an autoregressive design to forecast risk based on 7 days of prior patient data and was benchmarked against the DASA-IV clinical tool and other ML baselines. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an adverse mental health event recorded in the EMR within the following 24 hours. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and recall, alongside subgroup analyses and interpretability assessments using integrated gradients. RESULTS: The long short-term memory with attention mechanism achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC=0.83), outperforming existing tools such as DASA-IV by 0.20 AUC (0.81 vs 0.61) and demonstrating the potential of ML-based models to support proactive risk management in mental health settings. CONCLUSIONS: The PRIME tool is one of the first developed and evaluated deep learning-based EWS for psychiatric inpatient care. By outperforming existing clinical tools and providing interpretable, rolling predictions, PRIME offers a pathway toward safer, more proactive mental health interventions. Future work should assess its equity implications and integration into routine psychiatric workflows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Mental HealthSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207