MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417233264 · doi:10.1007/s00068-025-03027-x

Association between articular surface depression and functional outcomes after ORIF of tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4417233264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saad Madi, Said Chotta, Peter Abou Fadel, Mohamad Y. Fares, J. Zeichen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRuhr-Universität Bochum
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studySports medicineDepression (economics)WOMACDeformityCohort studyReduction (mathematics)Cohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Tibial plateau fractures (TPF) involving the articular surface are among the most severe joint injuries of the lower extremities. The effect of precise reduction of TPF on postoperative outcomes remains uncertain. While several studies have emphasized the importance of restoring articular congruity, others have reported limited correlation between radiographic parameters and long-term function, leaving it unclear which aspects of reduction truly drive functional recovery. This study aims to evaluate and correlate postoperative CT scan parameters of patients who underwent ORIF for TPF with patient reported outcomes at 6 years post-surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with cross-sectional outcome assessment was conducted on patients who underwent ORIF for tibial plateau fractures between 2016 and 2019. Patients without postoperative CT or lost to follow-up were excluded. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were analyzed for articular depression, plateau tilt, condylar widening, and posterior tibial slope. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), were obtained and correlated with CT findings to identify predictors of poor outcome. RESULTS: Of 71 patients, 49 were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 51.6 years; 26 (53%) were men and 23 (47%) women. The mean follow-up was 6 years. The mean WOMAC and KOOS scores were 36.7 ± 19.1 and 58.9 ± 18.9, respectively. A post-operative articular step-off of ≥ 2.5 mm was significantly associated with worse WOMAC scores (p = 0.004). Other radiologic parameters, including condylar widening, tibial plateau tilt, and articular depression, showed no significant correlation with WOMAC or KOOS scores. CONCLUSION: A postoperative step-off deformity exceeding 2.5 mm on postoperative CT scans significantly impacts the mid-term functional outcome of patients undergoing ORIF after TPF, as evidenced by poorer WOMAC scores. This study emphasizes the importance of accurate TPF reduction to optimize patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency SurgerySame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207