MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417239819 · doi:10.1128/mbio.02141-25

Immunomodulatory functions of fungal melanins in respiratory infections

2025· review· en· W4417239819 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle J. Basham, Rebecca Ward, Jatin M. Vyas, Kirstine Nolling Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAntifungalImmune systemRespiratory tractMelaninVirulencePathogenicityRespiratory tract infections

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rate of invasive fungal infections has risen drastically over the last decade and continues to carry devastatingly high mortality rates. Currently, there are no licensed vaccines and limited antifungal agents in clinical trials for fungal-mediated diseases. The limited effectiveness of FDA-approved antifungal medications against invasive fungal infections and the lack of mechanistic understanding of how these infections manifest pose a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Therefore, understanding the molecular details of the host-fungal interactions has never been more urgent. Here, we examine the role of fungal melanin as a virulence factor through its immunomodulatory effects during respiratory infections. Although previous literature on fungal pathogenicity has touched briefly on fungal pigments, they are incomplete in discussing how melanin dysregulates essential functions of the innate immune system. To provide a contemporary perspective, literature on melanized fungal species commonly associated with infections via the respiratory tract has been reviewed to detail holistic mechanisms by which melanin subverts the immune system and manipulates the respiratory epithelium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207