MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417243673 · doi:10.3138/jcs-2025-0007

Folding Back the Covers on Canada’s History of Indigenous Dispossession: The Evolution of the KAIROS Blanket Exercise

2025· article· en· W4417243673 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Chris Hiller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKairosIndigenousGeneral partnershipGrassrootsIndigenous rightsTraditional knowledgeEconomic JusticeColonialism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to calls for public education by the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, the Aboriginal Rights Coalition (ARC), a church-funded partnership supporting Indigenous rights, collaborated with Indigenous organizations to create a popular education tool aimed at raising awareness among Canadians about the Indigenous “land question.” Over the last 30 years, especially under the curation of ARC’s successor, KAIROS Canada, the KAIROS Blanket Exercise (KBE) has evolved: from a humble exercise performed in church basements; to a tool for animating local, regional, national, and international Indigenous rights campaigns; to an adaptable resource for teaching Indigenous-settler history; to what some envisioned as a movement toward truth and reconciliation. Following increased exposure during Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, demand skyrocketed, with thousands of exercises being performed in schools and other institutions across the country. Led by KAIROS staff and a network of Indigenous facilitators, settler volunteers, and Elders and Knowledge Keepers, this explosion fostered burgeoning engagement with Canada’s ongoing colonial history and proliferated diverse forms of relationship building and activism. In this article, the author traces the emergence and evolution of the KBE, using Indigenous and anti-colonial pedagogical literatures to consider its impact over time. Drawing on sharing circles and interviews conducted with ARC and KAIROS staff, volunteers, and network members, the author explores the opportunities, tensions, and contradictions that arose as the KBE shifted from its grassroots origins toward more standardized, monetized, and internationalized expressions. The article explores critical questions pertaining to Indigenous voice and sovereign storytelling, ownership and control, historic and ongoing complicity, un/settling questions of land and sovereignty, and dis/connections between education and concrete Indigenous struggles. The author concludes by reflecting on what educators, activists, and scholars might learn from the twists and turns of the Blanket Exercise initiative about shifting Indigenous–settler relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207