MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417247156 · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.123202

Petrogenesis of syenites at Phalaborwa, Kaapvaal Craton: (isotope) geochemical, modelling and age constraints

2025· article· en· W4417247156 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Bolhar, Reza Maghdour‐Mashhour, Lorenzo Milani, Suman Mondal, Gary O’Sullivan, Reiner Klemd, Qing Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersDSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Integrated Mineral and Energy Resource AnalysisNational Research FoundationUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
KeywordsTitaniteZirconMonaziteBiotitePetrogenesisPlagioclaseMaficBaddeleyiteAllaniteAlkali feldspar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole rock major and trace element data and apatite compositions (including Nd isotopes) for fifteen syenites from intrusions surrounding the Phalaborwa carbonatite-phoscorite Complex are presented to evaluate magmatic sources, processes, and also petrogenetic relationships across alkaline provinces in the Kaapvaal Craton. Thermodynamic modelling (alphamelts) of fractional crystallization assuming a gabbroic parental melt reproduces syenite compositions, involving early clinopyroxene and apatite removal, dominant K-feldspar crystallization with minor ilmenite and magnetite, and late biotite and quartz fractionation. Discrepancies between observed and modelled major elements (higher K₂O, Al₂O₃; lower CaO, Na₂O, P₂O₅) are explained by accumulation of K-feldspar (minor biotite and clinopyroxene) and dilution of apatite, plagioclase and Ti-oxides. Apatite displays zoning and high REE–Sr contents are indicative of a magmatic origin. Minor and compositionally distinct apatite and unradiogenic εNd₂.₀₆ Ga (−1.4 to −12.0) imply assimilation of granitic/gneissic basement in some syenites. For most syenites, however, mixing models using suitable endmembers do not reproduce whole rock compositions. LA-SF-ICP-MS U Pb ages of zircon, titanite, rutile and monazite range from 2.03 to 1.86 Ga. Titanite and rutile ages (1936 ± 24 Ma, 1860 ± 65 Ma, 2 SE) record post-emplacement hydrothermal alteration. Only one monazite age of 2032 ± 9 (2 SE) Ma likely dates magmatic emplacement, slightly post-dating emplacement of the 2060 Ma carbonatite-phoscorite Complex, but coeval with mafic dyke intrusions. Imprecise zircon upper-intercept ages (2.5–1.9 Ga) and petrographic features in zircon, titanite and rutile are ascribed to hydrothermal alteration by fenitising fluids or thermal overprinting related to dyke emplacement. We propose a model whereby alkaline melts at Phalaborwa were (partly) derived from metasomatically-enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM). Mantle (re)fertilization likely began during a 2.9–2.8 Ga subduction event and continued with a major ~2.0 Ga hydrous metasomatic episode. A shared SCLM signature among several Kaapvaal alkaline complexes therefore registers (plume-induced?) melting of a subduction-metasomatized lithospheric mantle as an important crust formation process at 2 Ga.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207