MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417251521 · doi:10.1007/s10592-025-01729-8

Genomic analysis reveals population structure and guides conservation actions of the endangered plant, Pedicularis furbishiae (Orobanchaceae)

2025· article· en· W4417251521 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dawson M. White, Éric Normandeau, Manuel Lamothe, Peter R. Nelson, Richard H. Ree, Martin Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaUniversité Laval
FundersMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsOutcrossingEndangered speciesGenetic structureInbreedingGenetic diversityConservation geneticsPopulationPopulation genomicsBiodiversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pedicularis furbishiae is a globally rare, hemiparasitic perennial restricted to dynamic riverbank habitats along the Wolastoq (Saint John) River in Maine, USA, and New Brunswick, Canada. The species now faces severe threats from habitat fragmentation, altered hydrology, and demographic collapse—particularly in New Brunswick, where several subpopulations have been recently extirpated and where recovery activities are being undertaken to protect the species from further decline. In this study, we assembled the first reference genome for P. furbishiae and conducted reduced-representation genotyping by sequencing (GBS) across 69 individuals sampled from all major subpopulations. Despite recovering a modest number of SNPs (152), we identified four genetically distinct populations: one in Maine with some subpopulation structure and three isolated subpopulations in New Brunswick. Genetic diversity was low overall, with elevated inbreeding coefficients in Grand Falls and Medford populations. All subpopulations contain private alleles, indicating the importance of conserving even the most demographically vulnerable sites. These findings support an integrated conservation strategy combining seed banking, ex situ propagation, and genetic rescue through controlled outcrossing among subpopulations, and provide a critical genomic baseline to inform the recovery of this imperiled species through population reinforcement and reintroduction across its range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation GeneticsSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207