<i>Caenorhabditis briggsae</i> ancestral genomic hyper-diversity contrasts with globally distributed genome-wide haplotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparative genomics provides a powerful framework to uncover the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms that shape genetic diversity within and across species, revealing how shared and lineage-specific processes influence their evolutionary trajectories through time. The nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae is distributed world-wide and is a comparative model to Caenorhabditis elegans in the biology of development, cellular mechanisms, neurobiology, genetic mappings of complex traits, and genome evolution. Following massive collection efforts by the nematode research community, we present the isolation of over 2,000 wild strains and analyses of genome sequences that catalog over six million single-nucleotide and insertion-deletion variants. This genome and strain resource provide a powerful means to interrogate the causal genetic bases of phenotypic variation for diverse traits. Additionally, we describe its global population structure and discover new and genetically distinct groups within this primarily self-fertilizing species, including groups of highly related strains that were sampled across different continents. We leverage expansive genetic variation to decipher the effects of linkage and selection on the distribution of genetic diversity across the genome and across geographic regions. Within the species, we find genomic regions with extremely high levels of genetic variation similar to hyper-divergent regions found in C. elegans and other species. These regions harbor new genes and variation enriched for environmental sensing and pathogen responses. In comparison to the outbreeding sister species Caenorhabditis nigoni , we conclude that long-term balancing selection has maintained substantial functional variation since the divergence from their outbreeding ancestor, likely in response to differences in the ecological niche. Overall, this massive strain resource enables future comparative genetics and genomics studies, including genome-wide association studies between Caenorhabditis species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".