MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417261934 · doi:10.1192/bjp.2025.10494

Thirty-year outcome of anorexia nervosa: healthcare use and disability

2025· article· en· W4417261934 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra Rydberg Dobrescu, Lisa Dinkler, I. Carina Gillberg, Christopher Gillberg, Maria Råstam, Kristian Bolin, Elisabet Wentz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
FundersVetenskapsrådetStiftelserna Wilhelm och Martina Lundgrens
KeywordsAnorexia nervosaHealth careAnorexiaOutcome (game theory)Health professionals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Anorexia nervosa is associated with high personal and financial costs for sufferers, carers and society in general, but little is known about the long-term health economic burden. Aims To examine healthcare utilisation, social assistance, sick leave and disability pension in individuals with anorexia nervosa over a period of 30 years. Method Fifty-one individuals with adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa and 51 matched comparison cases (COMP) were recruited in the community and followed prospectively from 1985. All individuals were examined on five occasions. At the 30-year follow-up, mean age 44, data on in- and out-patient care, prescribed medications, social assistance, sick leave and disability pension were collected from Swedish national registers. Results The anorexia nervosa group had more days of in-patient care ( p < 0.001) and out-patient visits to psychiatry ( p < 0.001), more days of sick leave ( p = 0.006), more days of disability pension ( p = 0.002) and were prescribed more psychotropic medication ( p = 0.045) compared with the COMP group. Of the anorexia nervosa group, 22% had ever received a disability pension compared with 2% in the COMP group ( p = 0.004) and less than half the anorexia nervosa group worked full-time at the 30-year follow-up. In the anorexia nervosa group, 45% had received social assistance at some point, compared with 22% in the COMP group ( p = 0.02). Age at onset of anorexia nervosa emerged as a predictor of healthcare utilisation with significant odds ratios for psychiatric in-patient (odds ratio 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.94; p = 0.027) and out-patient care (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.98; p = 0.042), i.e. individuals with a later onset of anorexia nervosa were less likely to require psychiatric care. Conclusions The long-term burden of adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa comprises increased utilisation of healthcare and dependence on society for a significant minority. A later onset of anorexia nervosa predicted a lower healthcare utilisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe British Journal of PsychiatrySame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207