MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417265897 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101207

Home Dialysis Transitions in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

2025· article· en· W4417265897 on OpenAlexafffundabout
D Verrelli, Reid Whitlock, Thomas W. Ferguson, Claudio Rigatto, Nathan Nickel, Karthik Tennankore, Oksana Harasemiw, Ranveer Brar, Clara Bohm

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityManitoba HealthSeven Oaks General HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
FundersInstitut canadien d'information sur la santéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInterrupted time seriesInterrupted Time Series AnalysisHome hemodialysisHome dialysisDialysisPandemic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale & Objective During the COVID-19 pandemic, nephrology societies recommended transition from facility-based hemodialysis to home dialysis to minimize risks associated with COVID-19 infection. We compared transition rates from facility-based hemodialysis to home dialysis and rates and reasons for transfers from home dialysis to facility-based hemodialysis before and during the pandemic in Canada. Study Design Interrupted time-series analysis. Setting & Population Using administrative data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, our cohort included 31,596 and 22,607 adults with any time on hemodialysis during the pre-pandemic and pandemic study periods, respectively. Exposure Early pandemic (April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2021) versus pre-pandemic (January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2019). Outcomes Monthly rates of transitions between facility-based hemodialysis and home dialysis, reasons for transfer from home to facility. Analytical Approach Segmented linear regression and analysis of covariance. Results During the early pandemic, transitions to home dialysis rose by 0.60 per 10,000 patients/month (95% CI: 0.08,1.11; P=0.03), beyond the non-significant monthly pre-pandemic trend of 0.02 per 10,000 (95% CI: –0.10,0.13; P=0.80). Monthly transfers from home dialysis to facility-based hemodialysis per 10,000 home dialysis patients also increased during the pandemic (6.91; 95% CI: 3.42, 10.40; P<0.001) versus the pre-pandemic period (-1.78; 95% CI: -4.31,0.75; P=0.20). The rate of increase in home-to-facility transfers during the pandemic was not significantly different than facility-to-home transfers (-0.10 transfers/month; 95% CI: -1.51,1.31; P=0.89). More transfers to facility occurred for geographic/resource-related reasons during the pandemic versus pre-pandemic (5.8% vs 2.7%; p <0.0001). Limitations Inability to analyze change in trends by province and ecological bias. Conclusions Transitions from facility-based hemodialysis to home dialysis increased, suggesting kidney care programs in Canada implemented recommendations intended to decrease COVID-19-related risks in this population. Reasons for the observed increase in transfers from home to facility during the pandemic are unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207