MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417272651 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2098

The JWST Rocky Worlds DDT Program Reveals GJ 3929b to Likely Be a Bare Rock

2025· article· en· W4417272651 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Qiao Xue, Michael Zhang, Brandon Park Coy, Madison Brady, Xuan Ji, Jacob L. Bean, Michael Radica, Andreas Seifahrt, Julian Stürmer, R. Luque, Ritvik Basant, N. M. Brown, Tanya Das, David C. Kasper, Caroline Piaulet, Eliza M.-R. Kempton, Edwin S. Kite

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlanetEclipseExoplanetRadial velocityBrightnessAlbedo (alchemy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report first results from the JWST Rocky Worlds Director’s Discretionary Time program. Two secondary eclipses of the terrestrial exoplanet GJ 3929b were recently observed using MIRI photometric imaging at 15 μ m. We present a reduction of these data using the updated SPARTA pipeline. We also refine the planet mass, radius, and predicted time of secondary eclipse using a new sector of TESS data and new, high-precision radial velocities from the MAROON-X spectrograph. For the two JWST observations, we recover secondary eclipse depths of 177 − 45 + 47 ppm and 143 − 35 + 34 ppm at times consistent with a nearly circular orbit, as expected from the radial velocity data. A joint fit of the two visits yields a dayside brightness temperature T p ,dayside = 782 ± 79 K for GJ 3929b, which is consistent with the maximum brightness temperature T max = 737 ± 14 K for a bare black rock (i.e., assuming zero Bond albedo and no heat redistribution). These results rule out CO 2 -rich atmospheres thicker than 100 mbar at >3 σ , suggesting that GJ 3929b has lost any significant secondary atmosphere. The radial velocity data also indicate two additional nontransiting planets in the system: a previously identified planet in a 15.0 days orbit and a newly identified planet candidate in a 6.1 days orbit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207