MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417276049 · doi:10.2196/78696

Prevalence and Intensity of Catastrophic Health Expenditure Among Residents in a Multiethnic Province in China: Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4417276049 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenning Sun, Shilong Zhang, Y Ye, Zengbing Fang, Y. F. Zheng, Gang Cheng, Qingyue Meng, Haipeng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusPublic healthHealth equityHealth insurancePopulationRural populationHealth economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hainan is a pilot free trade port in China and a multiethnic province. Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) reflects health care inequity, particularly affecting vulnerable groups in rapidly developing multiethnic regions. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze CHE prevalence and intensity and their influencing factors among residents in a Chinese multiethnic province. METHODS: Data from the 2023 Hainan Province Health Services Survey, conducted among 14,532 individuals aged 18 years or older, were used in a multistage stratified cluster sampling. CHE was defined as out-of-pocket health care payments exceeding 40% of the household's capacity to pay. The chi-square test and a logistic regression were used to identify influencing factors for CHE. Nonparametric tests and quantile regression were used to evaluate the influencing factors for CHE intensity. RESULTS: The prevalence of CHE in Hainan province was 8.37%, with a median intensity of 17.67% (IQR 8.31%-29.77%). Residents were more likely to experience CHE if they were older than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.928, 95% CI 1.602-2.320; P<.001), unmarried (OR 1.241, 95% CI 1.075-1.433; P=.003), or had chronic illnesses (OR 2.214, 95% CI 1.930-2.540; P<.001). Ethnic minority groups (OR 0.774, 95% CI 0.679-0.883; P<.001) as well as middle-income (OR 0.722, 95% CI 0.600-0.869; P=.001), high-middle-income (OR 0.739; 95% CI 0.609-0.898; P=.002), and high-income (OR 0.591, 95% CI 0.474-0.738; P<.001) groups were less likely to experience CHE. At lower CHE intensity (20th percentile), individuals older than 60 years (β=1.935; P=.03) and middle-income (β=1.737; P=.04) and rural (β=2.202; P=.005) residents showed positive associations. At the 50th percentile, low-middle-income (β=-5.052; P=.005), high-middle-income (β=-4.203; P=.03), and high-income (β=-6.534; P=.004) groups showed negative associations. At the 80th percentile, high-middle-income (β=-7.143; P=.03) and rural (β=-6.241; P=.005) groups showed stronger financial protection. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing CHE risks remains a critical challenge in Hainan province, highlighting structural inequities rooted in socioeconomic disparities and health vulnerabilities. Therefore, policy should prioritize primary prevention in the lowest-income populations while implementing enhanced insurance coverage for rural populations facing extreme costs to alleviate the most severe financial burdens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and SurveillanceSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207