Prospective short-term observational study of glucosamine complex with chondroprotectors effect in adults with diagnosed knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (Translation to Russian)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and/or hip is a chronic degenerative disease that severely impacts quality of life. Current treatments, such as NSAIDs, provide only symptomatic relief and are associated with significant side effects. This study evaluates whether short-term supplementation with a glucosamine complex (glucosamine, chondroitin, hyaluronic acid, omega-3, type II collagen) can improve OA symptoms. Materials and methods. A prospective observational study recruited 200 OA patients from family physician practices in Latvia. Patients were divided into 1) Study group (n=100) receiving Artroveron® 5in1 COMPLEX WITH OMEGA-3 (Glucosamine hydrochloride 300 mg, Omega-3 fatty acids 100 mg, Chondroitin sulfate 50 mg, Hyaluronic acid 20 mg, Type II collagen 20 mg); 2) Control group (n=100) receiving no chondroprotectors. Pain levels were assessed at baseline and after 30 days using: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results. Study group (glucosamine complex) had a statistically significant reduction in pain scores compared to the control group (p0.001). WOMAC pain score decreased from 7.3±3.8 to 6.0±3.6 (p0.001). WOMAC stiffness score improved from 3.4±1.7 to 2.6±1.8 (p0.001). WOMAC difficulty score reduced from 26.6±11.3 to 21.0±11.5 (p0.001). VAS pain score decreased from 5.8±1.6 to 4.9±1.5 in the study group, compared to 4.8±1.8 to 4.2±2.0 in controls (p0.001). Conclusion. Shortterm supplementation with Artroveron® 5in1 COMPLEX WITH OMEGA-3 significantly reduced OA pain and stiffness compared to untreated control group. These findings suggest that glucosamine supplementation may serve as an effective alternative for OA symptom management. This article is published in the journal Consilium Medicum in Russian with the permission of the copyright holders. The original article: Puce M, Medne-Simsone A, Sprudza K. Prospective Short-Term Observational Study of Glucosamine Complex with Chondroprotectors Effect in Adults with Diagnosed Knee and/or Hip Osteoarthritis. Health 2025;17:405-424. doi: 10.4236/health.2025.174027 is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".