MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417280112 · doi:10.1007/s13555-025-01612-x

Exploring New Dimensions in Longitudinal Rosacea Management

2025· review· en· W4417280112 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Schaller, Belinda Welsh, Giuseppe Micali, Jerry Tan, J.Q. Del Rosso, Julie Harper, Thomas Dirschka, Soyun Cho, Luiz Maurício Costa Almeida, Khen Kon, Wioletta Barańska‐Rybak, Johannes F. Dayrit, Linda Stein Gold

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology and Therapy · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersGalderma
KeywordsRosaceaPatient EmpowermentQuality of life (healthcare)DiseaseEmpowermentDisease managementHealth professionalsHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rosacea is a common, chronic, inflammatory disease of the skin, which predominantly (but not exclusively) affects the centrofacial region. Clinical features may include transient or persistent facial erythema, recurrent flushing, telangiectasia, papules, pustules, phymatous changes, and ocular disturbances. These can lead to significant physical and psychological burden and discomfort, which adversely affects a patient's quality of life (QoL). While current guidelines provide recommendations on treatment initiation and modification, there is a lack of information for long-term management and maintenance. The Rosacea-Expert Advice on Combined and Holistic approaches (REACH) group is an international group of experienced dermatologists, brought together to address these shortcomings. This paper summarizes discussions from three REACH Global Scientific Committee (GSC) meetings, with the objective to simplify the rosacea management pathway and ensure that healthcare professionals are aware of rosacea triggers, pathogenesis, risk factors, comorbidities, chronicity, patient satisfaction, monitoring, and treatment options. The REACH GSC developed a rosacea management pathway as a backbone for this publication-to advise on each step, including pitfalls to avoid, patient discussions to conduct, tools and guidelines to employ, and clinical factors to consider. Being able to discern all the clinical features of rosacea specific to each patient is imperative, from recognizing overriding signs and symptoms to understanding potential comorbidities and assessing impact on QoL. Clear and sensitive communication regarding these elements, and what outcomes are achievable, will help to optimize therapeutic management and foster a sense of patient empowerment and disease control. For patients, being able to engage in their own long-term care of symptoms, signs, and flares is critical. Deepening the understanding of the condition as a chronic, yet eminently manageable one, will help empower patients with rosacea and their dermatologists alike. The REACH GSC project was initiated and funded by Galderma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatology and TherapySame topicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsFrench-language works237,207